Released: Jun 23, 1997
The original investigation found there were multiple causes for the midair collision, the majority of which occurred in air traffic control.
One contributing factor was that the F-16 pilot did not "see and avoid" and stay "well clear" of the C-130 as required by regulation. This was mitigated, however, by the pilot's statement that he could not see the C-130.
The Department of Defense Inspector General's review of the original report confirmed that air traffic control was a major factor in the accident; however, it also concluded that the report failed to adequately inquire into the actions of the F-16 pilot.
The Secretary of the Air Force directed a further investigation into this issue.
The new investigation team looked at all the issues considered mitigating factors for the F-16 pilot. They confirmed that the flight paths of his aircraft and the C-130 made it impossible for him to see the C-130 for all but 12 seconds after he started a simulated flame-out maneuver and that during that 12 seconds, the camouflage-painted C-130 was nearly impossible to see against the forested terrain.
The investigation team found that the F-16 pilot received confusing tower transmissions. Also, after he heard the call, "C-130 traffic short final on the go," he had 17 to 20 seconds (excluding reaction time) to have made adjustments to his flight path; however, immediately following this transmission, he was cleared to land by the air traffic controllers.
The new investigation team also found that after the confusing tower communications, the pilot did not ask the tower about the position of the other aircraft and did not stop flying the simulated flame-out maneuver in order to look for the traffic.
The commander of the 9th Air Force at Shaw AFB, S.C., will review the accident investigation report to determine whether any disciplinary, administrative or other actions are appropriate. (Courtesy of Air Combat Command News Service)